INTRA/GV/GV009Accountability evidence
The material by which the program can show how it reached a decision about itself: a threshold set, an instrument chosen, a policy changed. As distinct from asserting that the decision was reached properly, and as distinct from the record of a single case, which the investigation pillar holds.
| Control | Jurisdiction | Source | What it establishes | Prerequisite or recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GV009/EUMandatory | European Union | Regulation (EU) 2016/679, articles 5(2), 6, 9, 12, 15, 22, 35, and 88European Parliament and Council · read 11 Aug 2026 | The grounds on which processing may rest, the burden of showing it, the categories whose processing is prohibited outright save on a named ground, what a person asking has to be told and by when, the limit on deciding about someone by machine alone, when an impact assessment is owed, and the leave each member state has to set its own employment rule. | The controller has to be responsible for the principles and able to demonstrate compliance with them, which is a duty to show rather than to assert. The article stops there. It does not itemise what has to be kept, nor does it say that every decision has to be reconstructable. |